High-Risk AI System Assessment
Your first step to full EU AI Act compliance
Every AI system must be classified. We deliver a clear, defensible risk assessment for each model or system—plus concrete next steps if it is high-risk—so you avoid misclassification, delays, and fines.
Why this matters
- Classification is mandatory
- Required by the AI Act
- Misclassification is expensive
- Delays & procurement friction
- Penalty exposure
- Avoid enforcement risk
Every system must be assessed; classification dictates all downstream obligations.
Wrong tier leads to wrong controls and potential market withdrawal.
Get the decision and evidence right early to avoid revenue-scaled fines.
Why this assessment - Why Conforma Studio
Led by a lawyer and software engineer, with documentation you can show to procurement, auditors, and regulators.
Law × Engineering
We match regulatory definitions to real architectures, data flows, and model behavior.
Defensible outcomes
Clear reasoning, Annex references, and evidence links you can show.
Precision
Borderline cases handled. We flag gray areas and reclassification risks early.
Speed
Focused intake, fast iteration, final document ready for procurement and compliance.
Roadmap
A practical action plan covering documentation, risk management, testing, and notified-body path.
What you get - A professional, regulator-ready assessment
A defensible classification with the legal basis, technical rationale, and evidence links—ready to live in your technical file and to answer procurement, auditors, and regulators.
- Risk tier decision
- Clear classification aligned to AI Act scope and definitions.
- Annex mapping
- Traceable mapping against Annex III high-risk categories.
- Borderline analysis
- Flags reclassification hazards and dependency risks.
- Evidence list
- Inputs reviewed, assumptions, and references you can show.
- Action plan
- If high-risk, stepwise obligations and owners.
- Time to value
- Fast turnaround from kickoff to signed deliverable.
How it works
Step 1 — Kickoff and scoping (30–45 min)
We map purpose, users, data, model type, integrations, deployment, and markets served.
- Roles: provider, deployer, user, importer
- Intended purpose and context of use
- Architecture and data flow overview
Step 2 — Legal–technical analysis
We test your facts against AI Act scope and Annex III categories; we assess borderline cases.
- Scope & exclusions screening
- Annex III category tests
- Reclassification risk flags
Step 3 — Assessment document (draft → final)
You receive the full write-up with rationale and implications for obligations.
- Risk tier decision and reasoning
- Evidence and assumptions list
- Review session and edits
Step 4 — Next steps if high-risk
A prioritized roadmap aligned to the Act’s obligations and your delivery plan.
- Technical documentation (Annex IV)
- Risk management, testing, post-market
- Notified body & conformity path
Avoid the million-euro mistake.
Get a defensible classification and a practical roadmap if your system is high-risk. Built by a lawyer and software engineer, ready for procurement and regulators.
Request assessmentBooking - Request your session
Share your goals with us and discover how we can guide you through complex compliance requirements.